Court of Civil Affairs in Baghdad

🕗 öffnungszeiten

kommentare 5

• 

  maab ayad

  :: 18 September 2023 09:42:52

  Bad morals and mistreatment by members

• 

  مصطفى احمد

  :: 27 January 2023 19:29:09

  The best court, I swear to God, and judges who will never take bribes, and a strong guide and the best card for the state.

• 

  حسين آل خريس

  :: 08 October 2020 13:47:09

  Nice

• 

  طوق الياسمين

  :: 16 April 2019 21:39:13

  ((In Sharia lawsuits)) Decisions to correct Qassam Sharia The claim of the plaintiffs is that the defendant (their sister) had previously obtained the legal Qassam (number / in), and it was stated that the husband of the deceased (B), who is their late father (C), was deceased... even though he died at a later date than the Qassam was issued on a date according to the death certificate ( With the number / in / issued by) they request that the defendant be invited to plead and issue a ruling to correct the legal division and correct the date of her father’s death... and to also include them among the heirs... and for the purpose of drawing They are filing a lawsuit for one hundred million dinars. And for the public pleading in the presence... and for the plaintiffs to repeat what was stated in the summons... and for the court to see a copy of the legal division issued by this court - pertaining to the heirs of the deceased (B) and restricting the inheritance to her adult daughter (F)... and it reviewed a copy of the death certificate of the deceased (C). And on the copy of the registration issued by - for the family of the deceased (B) and on the letter of the Civil Status Department - which states that the copy of the registration is valid... and after The court reached this point in the case and reviewed the principles of the Federal Court of Cassation to find that they were identical to what this court followed. Here are some of these principles. The cassation decision, No. 199, serial number 528, dated 3/5/2007, indicated (that the lawsuit to correct the legal division is an inheritance lawsuit and must be filed with money.. In light of what was stipulated in Article 306, Paragraph 3, the last part of the Civil Procedure Code)... and the cassation decision No. /576, serial /760 on 3/18/2007, which referred to.. (since Article 310, Paragraph /1/E of the Law Civil proceedings stipulate that the person requesting the Qassam must be one of the heirs of the deceased...or authorized by an official body to obtain the Qassam and review it. To organize it.. and this applies to whoever asks to correct or cancel the Qassam)... and the cassation decision No. / 259 serial / 2706 on 5/11/2011, which indicated (that the plaintiff filed the lawsuit in his personal capacity and the court was required to decide to defend the defendant’s agent, since the aforementioned is not He inherits from the deceased.. and that his heir, assuming the claim is true, is his inheritor, and this requires adding him to the estate.. Because this was related to the status, i.e. the dispute, it was necessary to dismiss the lawsuit from this side... noting that correcting the legal division requires first including the person in the legal division and then correcting the inheritance issue... so he decided to annull it)... and the cassation decision No. /114 on 11/17/ 1987, which indicated (if a dispute occurs between two courts regarding the spatial jurisdiction of a lawsuit to correct a Qassam... the court that issued the required legal Qassam Correcting it is that she is spatially competent to consider the case and issue the appropriate ruling therein)... And since the plaintiff’s agent raised the issue of the defendant’s action, in accordance with the aforementioned legal division, to sell the property - and then address the Real Estate Registry Department - and we received a copy of the real estate registry (with the number / in / session number / on behalf of) We also received the letter from the same department, and it was stated in Paragraph 6 of the book: “According to the registration, a transfer transaction was registered in the name of the heir, and according to the legal division and Paragraph 7 of the book, the sale transaction was registered in your name, and there are no reservations or impediments on the property.” Therefore, the court decided to put a sign of non-disposal on the property - until this case is resolved... because the disposal was in light of the criteria of the division that was required to be corrected... after the defendant had had enough. By mentioning her name as the sole heir of the deceased (B).. After all that was mentioned, the plaintiffs’ attorney presented a copy of the legal partition (issued by / numbered / in) for the heirs of the deceased (B), which is a second partition other than what was indicated... and in which her inheritance is limited to her husband (C) and her adult children from him - and here we have two partitions. Two legal records relating to one deceased woman, namely (B)... The first was issued by this court (which is requested to be corrected) and the second was issued by the Personal Status Court in Al-Kadhimiya, dated later in the year 2004.. The court returned to applying the principles of the Court of Cassation in this case.. The first decision that I reviewed in issue / 2623, serial / 3027 on 5/24/2011, which indicated.. (The distinguished ruling was found to be correct and in accordance with the provisions of the law in terms of the result.. since what is proven in the case is the existence of a decree issued by the Personal Status Court in his case - By number / in relation to the deceased - and despite this, it is not permissible to issue a new section from the Personal Status Court in Fallujah... as the first section is what matters... and on Assuming the existence of an error, he is the one who accepts correction.. As for the second section - the subject of the lawsuit.. What is required is for the plaintiff to review the competent court to request its annulment... because it is not permissible to issue two partitions for one deceased... which makes the correction claim unacceptable and requires its rejection by this party)... and the cassation decision No. 2113 of 11/13/2005, which indicated (that a court of jurisdiction The permanent residence of the deceased is subject to the issuance of legal shares. The first share is the one that is relied upon. It is not permissible to issue other shares for the same person. The deceased is from the same court or even

• 

  doaa tahseen

  :: 01 October 2013 03:07:41

  Not good i feel